Similar Articles

OWASP Top Ten: Broken Authentication and Session Management

I'm back with another part of my OWASP "Top Ten" series - this time with a focus on one of the more difficult issues to face web application developers: user authentication and session management.

This is a huge topic and could take many, many (many) articles to cover and a lot of what it boils down to is "it depends". There's so many methods for authentication out there and so many different kinds of permissioning, there's not a One Right Way to handle things. There are, however, some good practices to follow when you're working with user authentication. Here's some of the best of them you really should be following in your development:

  1. Don't reinvent the wheel: Yes, I know your authentication is as different from the next guys as Vogons are from mice, but that doesn't mean you have to write it all yourself. There's tons of helpful libraries out there for your language of choice that have been vetted over time and improved. I'm willing to bet that, because of some of the common mistakes (exactly the ones that the OWASP points to as bad practices) will come up... and you'll miss them. Pick your head up out of the code for an hour and take a look around. I bet you'll find something, if not close, exactly what you're looking for and - even better - you don't have to maintain it!

  2. Use SSL: If you value the security of your application at all, you'll be much better off in the long run of you take a little time and get your site set up to use an SSL certificate and HTTPS as its primary protocol. In case you're curious about what kind of advantages HTTPS offers over HTTP, check out articles like this or this to get the lowdown. For the lazy out there, the real key to it is that HTTPS uses SSL (Secure Socket Layer) to transmit the data over the wire. This makes use of a certificate on both the server and client side to encrypt the data and decrypt it when it's received. This encryption heps prevent a lot of the problems that can come up with trasmitting data in the clear via HTTP. Remember, though - it's not a cure all and it definitely doesn't mean you can get sloppy with how you handle your user's data!

  3. Use (and enforce) strong passwords: Sure, you can only protect your users from themselves so far, but this is one thing you definitely have control over. When a user signs up for your site (assuming you're using something like a traditional user/password auth, not OpenID or anything) enforce harder standards on their passwords before they can successfully sign up. How complex you go is really up to you, but there are some recommendations as to what makes stronger passwords:

    • At the least, 8 to 10 characters
    • At least one capital letter
    • At least one lowercase letter
    • At least one digit and special character
    • Do not allow one that's been used in the last year (on "forgot password") or similar
    • Anything listed on any page in these results
    • Not containing any part of the username
    • Is not a sequence of letters on the keyboard (ex. "qwerty" or "12345678")
    • Don't exclude characters

    Of course, you should always inform the user of these restrictions and provide them with immediate feedback as to the strength of their password (and if it meets your requirements).

  4. At the very least, store passwords hashed: As tempting as it is to store the passwords as-is when you get them from the user directly to the database, this is essentially the same as inviting any attackers in and giving them the keys to the kingdom. You have a responsibility not only to the user data that you're protecting with your authorization but also to the data for your users on other systems. People are creatures of habit and will almost always use the same login information across multiple sites. Imagine the damage someone with even minimal skills could do with plain-text passwords at their disposal.

    When a user signs up, at the very least hash their password against a static app-wide hash that you've defined before putting the values into whatever data store you're using. An even better mechanism would be to create a unique hash for each user on signup that you could use as the salt to generate their hashed password. This salt could be combined with other information in your application to evaluate the user when they log in.

    This is not the pinacle of security when it comes to password storage, but you'd be suprised at how many developers (and companies - big ones too) don't even bother with something as small as this. If you want to take things to the next level, consider replacing the hashing option and encrypting the passwords instead.

  5. For high security, whitelist: If your application requires an even higher level of secuity and you're particularly concerned about users accessing things they shouldn't, consider moving from a "blacklist" to a "whitelist" solution for access control. In the typical "blacklist" solution, you look at the resource they are trying to access to see if they're prevented from using it. While this sort of checking can be easier, it can also lead to unintended consequences if you forget a single resource along the way. Consider instead taking the "whitelist" approach and granting them access to resources and parts of the application, not restricting them. More often than not this makes for a tighter security model.

  6. Use short-lived hashes: If you have something like a "Forgot Password" or "Forgot Username" feature of your application (if you do, guard it with your life) be sure that you include some sort of time-related hash attached to the link you provide them for the reset. If you only provide them with a link that relates to their user, that leaves the door wide open for any attacker to come in and abuse it.

    By having the hash and checking it on submit, you can ensure 1) that the user in question is the correct one that has the valid link and 2) the decreased chance that the service can be abused.

  7. Define a "lockout threshold": One thing you can do as a little extra protection is track the actions that are taken as they relate to things like logins, password resets and any other external facing user functionality. By tracking this kind of usage, you can provide a "lockout" if a high volume of requests come in around a certain user. Once a user's actions hit this threshold (lower for more security, obviously) you just lock it out of any further actions for a certain time period. More often than not, unless there's something malicious going on, your users will never see the problem.

    This can get a bit more tricky if you're dealing with something like an API that's designed for handling autmated access, but that's where fun things like request throttling and limitations can come in...a whole different topic.


Hopefully I've given you some good things to consider (and maybe bring back up) to help you protect your users from some of the more common authetication issues. The OWASP has some other great suggestions too - be sure to check out the resources for more information on those.


by Chris Cornutt

With over 12 years of experience in development and a focus on application security Chris is on a quest to bring his knowledge to the masses, making application security accessible to everyone. He also is an avodcate for security in the PHP community and provides application security training and consulting services.

Enjoying the article? Consider contributing to help spread the message!